Bensoussan trial divides French thinkers

France continues to be hit by fall-out from the trial of  Georges Bensoussan for ‘incitement to hatred’: public intellectual Alain Finkielkraut has resigned from LICRA –  one of the groups backing Bensoussan’s prosecution for saying that Arab antisemitism ‘is imbibed with mother’s milk.’ But more controversially,  support for the Moroccan-born French-Jewish historian, (author of a seminal work on Jews from Arab countries)  is coming from sections of the French far right. Cana’n Lipschitz reports in the Times of Israel (with thanks: Lily):

Georges Bensoussan: antisemitism is cultural

Discontent over Bensoussan’s prosecution
spread to more centrist circles, exposing the left-leaning LICRA to
criticism by Finkielkraut. Last year he received the country’s ultimate
academic distinction when he entered the Academie Francaise pantheon of
great thinkers.

On Jan. 29 Finkielkraut, a member of the
dovish JCall group of French Jews who oppose Israel’s settlement policy,
announced he would be resigning from LICRA over its decision to sue
Bensoussan.

The move “dishonored” LICRA, he said during an
interview with RCJ radio, accusing LICRA of “opting for inquisition”
against Bensoussan.

“I call on all activists, followers and
sympathizers to draw their own conclusions [about LICRA] from this
ignominy,” he said. Finkielkraut called the prosecution of Bensoussan
“an exceptionally grave event politically, judicially and historically.”

During the interview, Finkielkraut noted that
Bensoussan in 2015 was paraphrasing the statements of the Algeria-born
sociologist Smaïn Laacher, a non-Jew who said that anti-Semitism in
Muslim areas is “in the air that one breathes.”

Laacher and Bensoussan were using metaphors,
Finkielkraut argued, and neither “speak of any biological dimension to
the culturally transmitted phenomenon they describe.” That refutes the
“incitement to racial hatred” charge, he said.

But in an election year with the far-right
National Front group leading in the polls, this technicality was soon
eclipsed in the media by the trial’s broader implications on free speech
and race relations.

The trial “is a way of avoiding investigative
thought and any public expression on Islam except for praise,”
Finkielkraut said in the RCJ interview.

In a scathing op-ed in the Marianne weekly,
columnist Martine Gozlan called the trial “shameful” and an attempt to
“silence free thought.”

It’s a recurring accusation by advocates of
several French thinkers, Jews and others, who have paid a personal and
public price recently for speaking out against Islam or in defense of
Israel.

The list includes Michel Houellebecq, who has
received death threats for writing a novel critical of political Islam;
Bernard-Henri Levy, who is reviled by many members of his left-wing
circles for defending Israel, and Finkilkraut himself, who was violently
ejected from a public gathering recently because he is a “Zionist.”

Gozlan also noted that LICRA’s fellow
plaintiff, the Collective Against Islamophobia, has been accused —
including by LICRA itself — of propagating anti-Semitic disinformation
against Prime Minister Manuel Valls, whose wife is Jewish.

On Feb. 2 Philippe Karsenty, the French Jewish
activist and deputy mayor of the Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine,
echoed Gozlan’s sentiment in an op-ed he wrote with lawyer Pierre
Lurçat.

“How could a group established to defend Jews
come to assist a judicial jihad waged against a Jewish intellectual
specialized in the history of the Holocaust?” they asked.

It was a withering attack on LICRA, a group
founded by a Jewish journalist in 1926 in an effort to defend a Jew
charged with the Paris killing of a Ukrainian nationalist. The Ukrainian
was responsible for pogroms in Ukraine in which the Jewish killer’s
relatives perished.

Amid growing criticism, the head of LICRA,
Alain Jacubowicz, who is Jewish, broke his silence about the affair. In
an op-ed published earlier this month, he accused Bensoussan of
“benefiting extremists” with his statement on Islam.

Jacubowicz had a point.

Bruno Gollnisch, a Holocaust denier and
European Parliament lawmaker for National Front, embraced Bensoussan’s
cause. In a Jan. 25 op-ed published on his website, Gollnisch equated
Bensoussan’s troubles to those of Jean-Marie Le Pen, who was sidelined
as the National Front’s leader after multiple convictions for hate
speech against Jews and Muslims.

“There are truths we’re forbidden to speak,” Gollnisch wrote about both men.

Bensoussan in turn broke his own silence on the affair and replied to Jacubowicz in an open letter published Monday.

Turning Jacubowicz’s claim against him,
Bensoussan wrote that the popularity of a populist, anti-immigrant party
like the National Front is being fueled by “a denial of reality, a
suicidal strategy of blindness and silence.”

Read article in full 

Freedom of thought goes on trial in France by Lyn Julius

France’s New Islamist guillotine by Denis McEoin 

The French Inquisition by Yves Mamou 

Is the Shoah memorial home to a racist? by Marc Weitzmann

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

About

This website is dedicated to preserving the memory of the near-extinct Jewish communities, of the Middle East and North Africa, documenting the stories of the Jewish refugees and their current struggle for recognition and restitution.

Point of No Return

Jewish Refugees from Arab and Muslim Countries

One-stop blog on the Middle East's
forgotten Jewish refugees - updated daily.