Why did it take 74 years to mark Farhud Day?

Writing in a number of news media, Edwin Black asks why it took so long to establish International Farhud Day, marked for the first time this year on the anniversary of the bloody pogrom in Iraq. The crushing weight of the Holocaust, the minimisation or ignorance of the role of the Mufti of Jerusalem, and the scepticism of the politicising media all contributed to the marginalisation of the Iraqi-Jewish Kristallnacht :

 From left, Shahar Azani of StandWithUs, Israeli Ambassador David Roet,
Malcolm Hoenlein of the President’s Conference holding the proclamation,
historian author Edwin Black, Avi Posnick of StandWithUs, Rabbi Elie
Abadie of Justice for Jews from Arab Countries and Alyza Lewin of the
American Association of Jewish lawyers and Jurists, at the United
Nations on International Farhud Day.

First, persecution of Jewish victims in
Arab countries did not conform to the established line of study that
followed the classic Holocaust definition, as archetypically expressed
by the USHMM’s mission statement: “The Holocaust was the
state-sponsored, systematic persecution and annihilation of European
Jewry by Nazi Germany and its collaborators between 1933 and 1945.” Note
the pivotal word “European.” This geographic qualifier left out the
Jews of Iraq as well as their persecuted coreligionists in North Africa,
where some 17 concentration camps were established by Vichy-allied and
Nazi influenced Arab regimes.

Second, because the persecution of Jews
in Arab lands during WWII and their forced exodus was considered beyond
the thematic horizon, the type of well-financed and skilled scholarship
that has riveted world attention on the Holocaust in Europe, generally
by-passed the Sephardic experience. Certainly, the overwhelming blood
and eternal sorrow of the Holocaust genocide was experienced by European
Jewry. But their deeply tragic suffering, including that endured by my
Polish parents, who survived, does not exclude the examination of other
groups. Years of focus on the plight of Gypsies, Jews in Japan, and
other persecuted groups proves that. Undeniably, a solid nexus clasps
the events of the Middle East, roiling in oil, colonialism, and League
of Nations Mandates, to a European theatre brimming with war crimes and
military campaigns.

After the 1941 Farhud and during the
subsequent years Husseini was on Hitler’s payroll, the Mufti of
Jerusalem toured European concentration camps and intervened at the
highest levels to send European children to death camps in occupied
Poland rather than see them rescued them into Mandate Palestine. In his
diary, Husseini called Adolf Eichmann “a rare diamond.” What’s more, the
tens of thousands of Nazified Arabs who fought in three Waffen SS
Divisions in the Balkans and across all of Europe, were fighting for a
Palestine and a greater Middle East Arab cause that hinged on Jewish
extermination and colonial upheaval. When I wrote The Farhud in 2010,
the focus was on excavating the details of a forgotten pogrom and a
forgotten Nazi alliance. Only in recent years has a renewed trickle of
excellent scholarship yielded gripping new research into the Arab role
in the Holocaust. For example, there is Islam and Nazi Germany’s War,
which The Wall Street Journal reviewed as “impeccably researched.” A
second book, Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East,
by (Barry Rubin and… – ed) meticulous Arab and Turkish culture researcher Wolfgang Schwanitz,
was published by Yale University Press. There are several excellent
others.

Third, critics say, that many of the
leading Jewish newspapers and wire services, now vastly more politicized
than they were in the prior decade, did not devote sufficient space and
informed knowledge to the topic. Moreover, some these critics suggest
that in recent years, the Jewish press seemed to have marginalized the
atrocity and its aftermath as a political discussion. “When former
Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon was doing his 2012 campaign for
Jewish refugees from Arab lands,” asserts Lyn Julius of the British
organization HARIF – Association of Jews from North Africa and the
Middle East, “hardly a day went by when certain Jewish or Israeli
newspapers did not politicize the matter, or suggest Israel was
exploiting the issue for political gain.”

In that vein, the day before the June 1,
2015 UN event, one prominent Jewish newspaper published an article on
the Farhud, which included this observation: “Now, Jewish organizations
and the Israeli government deploy it [memory of the Farhud] frequently
to support their claims for refugee recognition on behalf of Middle
Eastern Jews.” Before the UN ceremony, three different irate members of
the audience showed me this article on their tablets, and the consensus
of disdain was expressed by one Sephardic gentleman who objected, first
quoting the newspaper with derision: “‘Deploy it frequently to support
their claims for refugee recognition on behalf of Middle Eastern Jews?'”
and then adding, “They would never say such a thing about the European
Kristallnacht!” The complainers were equally astonished that this
prominent article made no mention of the Mufti of Jerusalem. They felt
the complete omission of Husseini’s involvement and the marginalization
of their nightmare was typical of the roadblocks they had encountered
during their decades-long struggle for recognition of their anguish.

But on June 1, 2015, yes, 74 inexcusably
years late and, yes, not an hour too soon, after waiting for thirty
minutes beneath a gaggle of umbrellas in the torrential rain at a narrow
admittance gate on First Ave, and then into a packed hall at the UN,
attended by diplomats from several countries, human rights activists of
various causes and key Jewish leaders from a communal spectrum, in an
event broadcast worldwide live by the UN itself, the stalwarts of Farhud
memory gathered to finally make the proclamation of International
Farhud Day — and made it loud and clear. In doing so, they made history
by simply recognizing history.

Read article in full

2 Comments

  • Bataween,

    I meant to enter a comment here a few weeks ago about an email request I made to the director of the Holocaust Center in suburban Detroit. This Center is well run and has a very good agenda and special events commemorating some Jewish calendar days, historical remembrance days as well as lectures with Q &A of some writers who write about the holocaust. However, as you guessed it right, nothing about the Farhud day.

    I explained that Farhud is a new marking date and should be given special attention to scheduling events in the future in order to bring awareness of the Jewish refugees from Arab lands. I also explained that this is even more pertinent because several Northern and Western suburban communities post one of the highest concentration of the Arab and Chaldean population is the United States, in addition to its diverse Jewish population. What a place and occasion to break the ice of apathy (if not to say ignorance) of the plight of the Jewish refugees from the Arab lands.

    The email was sent on June 2nd, and the Farhud day was June 1st. I also attached the link of the entry in your Blog. I have yet to receive a response acknowledging the receipt of the email. I would not be surprised if I receive the " Thanks, but NO thanks." I'll wait and see. It is safe to be prudent and hopeful that something will be planned for June 1st 2016. Let's hope.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

About

This website is dedicated to preserving the memory of the near-extinct Jewish communities, of the Middle East and North Africa, documenting the stories of the Jewish refugees and their current struggle for recognition and restitution.

Point of No Return

Jewish Refugees from Arab and Muslim Countries

One-stop blog on the Middle East's
forgotten Jewish refugees - updated daily.