Anti-Jewish bigotry ‘a relatively new phenomenon’?

The Adly synagogue in Cairo …not attacked at the start of the Arab Spring

Jew-hatred in Egypt is a relatively new phenomenon associated with the Mubarak regime, argues leftwing blogger Lisa Goldman in The Forward. But how new is new? And why is the elephant in the room – the Muslim Brotherhood whose virulent antisemitism dates back to the 1930s – missing from her analysis? In her zeal to argue that Egyptians are anti-Israeli, not anti-Jewish, Goldman says that the synagogue in Cairo was not attacked in the first days of the Arab Spring. (But Seder night in Alexandria was cancelled because the authorities could not guarantee the participants’ security outside daylight hours.)

The Arab Spring presents a conundrum for many liberal Jews. As liberals they feel compelled to advocate self-determination over tyranny and democracy over dictatorship. But as Jews they worry that the Arab dictators, particularly Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, held down the lid on a seething Pandora’s Box of popular anti-Semitism. On the contrary, though, I would posit that anti-Semitism festered in Egypt as a result of Mubarak’s policies, and that it will naturally fade away if Egypt succeeds in making the transition to a more transparent, democratic society.

When anti-regime activists attacked and burned the Israeli embassy in Cairo in September, the violent images seemed to underline Jewish fears. It is also true that one hears quite a lot of old-fashioned anti-Semitic talk in Egypt — conspiracy theories about Jewish lobbies, Jewish bankers and Jews in the media. Amongst the secondhand books for sale by a sidewalk vendor at Tahrir Square last spring, I saw an Arabic translation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. And an exhibition of political cartoons in downtown Cairo included some with caricatures of Israeli soldiers identified by their hooked noses, fang-like teeth and long, curly sidelocks.

But Mohamed Abla, the artist and political activist who curated the exhibition said, in answer to my question, “We show cartoons that we disagree with, too.” Those anti-Semitic caricatures, he explained, were published in pro-Mubarak newspapers that presented the Egyptian revolution as an anti-Egypt conspiracy cooked up between the unlikely allies of Israel, Hezbollah and the United States.

Amr El-Zant, an Egyptian physicist and a columnist for Al Masry Al Youm, Egypt’s best-known independent daily newspaper, describes Mubarak as an old-fashioned anti-Semite who thought that by having a close relationship with the Jews, some of their power would rub off on him. “He couldn’t understand why Israel failed to save him from the revolutionaries at Tahrir Square,” said Elzant, a former diplomat’s son who was once a postdoctoral fellow at Haifa’s Technion Institute.

The deposed dictator played sly games to maintain his grip on power. He cultivated his relationship with the Israeli elite — the politicians, the army and the business tycoons — while manipulating popular opinion at home by blaming opposition to his rule on “the Jews.” He convinced Israelis that he was all that stood between them and a howling, bloodthirsty mob, but he only visited Israel once in all the 30 years he ruled Egypt — to give a eulogy at Yitzhak Rabin’s funeral. He prevented normal contact by having his dreaded state security service investigate, harass and even arrest Egyptians who applied for a visa to Israel or maintained contact with Israelis. This is why young Egyptians are careful to differentiate between opposition to the State of Israel, which is widely reviled, and anti-Semitism. They saw how the regime used anti-Semitism to stir up conspiracy theories and manipulate public opinion in order to maintain its grip on power.

I did not meet any Egyptians who had read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. But I did meet many who had read Andre Aciman’s Out of Egypt, and Lucette Lagnado’s The Man in the White Sharkskin Suit — memoirs by Egyptian Jews who were forced out of the country during the Nasser era. Both titles were prominently displayed at several bookshops I visited in Cairo and Alexandria.

Amongst the politicians elected in Egypt’s first democratic elections, one still hears the occasional anti-Semitic remark. Fayza Abul Naga, a secular 61 year-old woman who is a holdover from the Mubarak regime, recently claimed that Freedom House, an American NGO that conducts research into democracy advocacy, was ‘a tool of the ‘Jewish lobby.”’

This is ugly and regrettable, but not, I think, insidious — and not because there are almost no Jews left in Egypt, but rather because Jew hatred is a relatively new, imported phenomenon that has little history in Egypt and does not seem to run very deep.

Take, for example, Cairo’s Shaare Shamayim Synagogue. It is a big, imposing building on Adly Street, in the heart of downtown, about five minutes’ walk from Tahrir Square. It is one of only two synagogues in Cairo still in use — I attended a seder there last spring. Under Mubarak, Shaare Shamayim was heavily guarded: Men in uniform checked the identity cards of visitors before passing them through a metal detector, while plainclothes officers stopped passersby from taking photographs. The message was clear: Without a strong security presence, the synagogue was vulnerable to attack. But there were no police on the streets for 15 days during the January 25 uprising. The synagogue was left completely unprotected. While the headquarters of the NDP, Mubarak’s political party, was set alight by protesters, as were other edifices associated with the regime, it never occurred to the protesters to attack the synagogue. The Israeli embassy, meanwhile, is halfway across town — but it was attacked, albeit several months after Mubarak resigned.

So does this mean that average Egyptians wants to cancel the peace treaty with Israel and go to war? No, not that either. They don’t like Israel and they would probably like to downgrade the diplomatic relationship, but no one wants war.

Read article in full

Egyptian hostility to Jews goes back decades


  • This rejection of a person becuase he:she was Jewish will be illustrated by a story my nonno told us (and he was shaking with rage)
    An officer talking of his wife said: "she is fantastic, it's a pity she is Jewish!"
    and my nonno answered: "aren't you ashamed of yourself talking about your chioldlren's mother in this way?
    sultana latifa
    a Jew from egypt happy to be away from them!

  • Had the "Forward" wanted to give its readers the truth, there is no shortage of experts on the subject that would have been happy to produce an article. But the Forward doesn't want to educate. It seeks to brainwash. Hence the obvious choice of Lisa Goldman.

  • Dawood Hosni (1870 – 1937)

    Tal'at: You know, Dawood, how much I wanted you to be in charge of the theater, but, ya khusartak fi'l Yahud (it's a pity you are Jewish).

    Hosni: Tal'at, I was born a Jew, I lead a Jewish life and I will die a Jew…

  • "Lisa Goldman typifies what today is called "Left." Ignorant, self-righteous, insensitive to reality, susceptible to irrational or non-rational arguments, all that fits Lisa and many others. The problem is compounded because today's "Left" is a manipulated body of public opinion. Their false & foolish notions are the thoughts of the bien pensant, not the dissident. They reflect what they are told by the radio, TV and newspaper."

    This should be on her resume.

  • Classic Lisa Goldman. Wishful thinking and anti-Zionist activism masqueraded as political analysis.

    Propaganda at its worse.

  • I suggest they try to build a democracy instead of vomitting on Jews, the latter had nothng to do with their lack of democracy.And also it is a loss of energy for nothing.
    sultana latifa
    a Jewish refugee from Egypt

  • there was a time, at least in the USA, when people who themselves "leftists" were better informed than most, more rational about most political issues, etc. Those days are long gone. Lisa Goldman typifies what today is called "Left." Ignorant, self-righteous, insensitive to reality [such as the ongoing slaughter in Syria], susceptible to irrational or non-rational arguments, all that fits Lisa and many others. The problem is compounded because today's "Left" is a manipulated body of public opinion. Their false & foolish notions are the thoughts of the bien pensant, not the dissident. They reflect what they are told by the radio, TV and newspaper.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This website is dedicated to preserving the memory of the near-extinct Jewish communities, of the Middle East and North Africa, documenting the stories of the Jewish refugees and their current struggle for recognition and restitution.

Point of No Return

Jewish Refugees from Arab and Muslim Countries

One-stop blog on the Middle East's
forgotten Jewish refugees - updated daily.